Prisma ORM Evaluation for Storage Classes
Overview
This document evaluates the storage backend options for the adblock-compiler project. Prisma ORM with SQLite is now the default storage backend.
Prisma Supported Databases
Prisma is a next-generation ORM for Node.js and TypeScript that supports the following databases:
Relational Databases (SQL)
| Database | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PostgreSQL | Full Support | Primary recommendation for production |
| MySQL | Full Support | Including MySQL 5.7+ |
| MariaDB | Full Support | MySQL-compatible |
| SQLite | Full Support | Great for local development/embedded |
| SQL Server | Full Support | Microsoft SQL Server 2017+ |
| CockroachDB | Full Support | Distributed SQL database |
NoSQL Databases
| Database | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| MongoDB | Full Support | Special connector with some limitations |
Cloud Database Integrations
| Provider | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Supabase | Supported | PostgreSQL-based |
| PlanetScale | Supported | MySQL-compatible |
| Turso | Supported | SQLite edge database |
| Cloudflare D1 | Supported | SQLite at the edge |
| Neon | Supported | Serverless PostgreSQL |
Upcoming Features (2025)
- PostgreSQL extensions support (PGVector, Full-Text Search via ParadeDB)
- Prisma 7 major release with modernized foundations
Current Implementation Analysis
Current Architecture: Prisma with SQLite
The project uses Prisma ORM with SQLite as the default storage backend:
PrismaStorageAdapter (SQLite/PostgreSQL/MySQL)
├── CachingDownloader
│ ├── ChangeDetector
│ └── SourceHealthMonitor
└── IncrementalCompiler (MemoryCacheStorage)
Key Characteristics:
- Flexible database support (SQLite default, PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc.)
- Cross-runtime compatibility (Node.js, Deno, Bun)
- Hierarchical keys:
['cache', 'filters', source] - Application-level TTL support
- Type-safe generic operations
Storage Classes Summary
| Class | Purpose | Complexity |
|---|---|---|
PrismaStorageAdapter | Core KV operations | Low |
D1StorageAdapter | Cloudflare edge storage | Low |
CachingDownloader | Smart download caching | Medium |
ChangeDetector | Track filter changes | Low |
SourceHealthMonitor | Track source reliability | Low |
IncrementalCompiler | Compilation caching | Medium |
Comparison: Prisma SQLite vs Other Options
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Prisma/SQLite | Prisma/PostgreSQL | Cloudflare D1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schema Definition | Prisma Schema | Prisma Schema | SQL |
| Type Safety | Generated types | Generated types | Manual |
| Queries | Rich query API | Rich query API | Raw SQL |
| Relations | First-class | First-class | Manual |
| Migrations | Built-in | Built-in | Manual |
| TTL Support | Application-level | Application-level | Application-level |
| Transactions | Full ACID | Full ACID | Limited |
| Tooling | Prisma Studio | Prisma Studio | Wrangler CLI |
| Runtime | All | All | Workers only |
| Infrastructure | None (embedded) | Server required | Edge |
Pros and Cons
Prisma with SQLite (Default)
Pros:
- Zero infrastructure overhead
- Cross-runtime compatibility (Node.js, Deno, Bun)
- Simple API for KV operations
- Works offline/locally
- Type-safe with generated client
- Built-in migrations and schema management
- Excellent tooling (Prisma Studio, CLI)
- Fast for simple operations
Cons:
- Single-instance only (no shared database)
- TTL must be implemented in application code
- Not suitable for multi-server deployments
Prisma with PostgreSQL
Pros:
- Multi-instance support
- Full ACID transactions
- Rich query capabilities
- Production-ready for scaled deployments
- Same API as SQLite
Cons:
- Requires database server
- Additional infrastructure overhead
- More complex setup
Cloudflare D1
Pros:
- Edge-first architecture
- Low latency globally
- Serverless pricing model
- No infrastructure management
Cons:
- Cloudflare Workers only
- Limited query capabilities
- Different API from Prisma adapters
Use Case Analysis
Current Use Cases
| Use Case | Data Pattern | Complexity | SQLite Fit | PostgreSQL Fit | D1 Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filter list caching | Simple KV with TTL | Low | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Health monitoring | Append-only metrics | Low | Good | Better | Good |
| Change detection | Snapshot comparison | Low | Good | Good | Good |
| Compilation history | Time-series queries | Medium | Good | Better | Good |
When to Use PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL is beneficial if:
- Multi-instance deployment - Shared database across servers/workers
- Complex queries required - Filtering, aggregation, joins
- Data relationships - Related entities need referential integrity
- Audit/compliance needs - Full transaction logs, ACID guarantees
- High concurrency - Multiple writers accessing the same data
When to Use SQLite (Default)
SQLite remains the best choice when:
- Single-instance deployment - One server or local development
- Simplicity is paramount - No external infrastructure needed
- Local/offline use - Application runs standalone
- Minimal maintenance - No database server to manage
When to Use Cloudflare D1
D1 is the best choice when:
- Edge deployment - Running on Cloudflare Workers
- Global distribution - Need low latency worldwide
- Serverless - No infrastructure management desired
Recommendation
Summary
Prisma with SQLite is the default choice for simplicity and zero infrastructure.
The existing storage patterns (caching, health monitoring, change detection) are well-suited to the Prisma adapter pattern. SQLite provides a simple embedded database that requires no external infrastructure.
Architecture
The project uses a flexible adapter pattern:
classDiagram
class IStorageAdapter {
+set~T~(key: string[], value: T, ttl?: number) Promise~boolean~
+get~T~(key: string[]) Promise~StorageEntry~T~ | null~
+delete(key: string[]) Promise~boolean~
+list~T~(options) Promise~Array~{ key: string[]; value: StorageEntry~T~ }~~
}
IStorageAdapter <|-- PrismaStorageAdapter
IStorageAdapter <|-- D1StorageAdapter
This allows switching storage backends based on deployment environment without changing application code.
Implementation Status
The project includes:
IStorageAdapter- Abstract interface for storage backendsPrismaStorageAdapter- Default implementation (SQLite/PostgreSQL/MySQL)D1StorageAdapter- Cloudflare edge deploymentprisma/schema.prisma- Prisma schema (for SQLite/PostgreSQL/MongoDB)
Conclusion
| Aspect | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Default Usage | Prisma with SQLite |
| Multi-instance | Prisma with PostgreSQL |
| Edge Deployment | Cloudflare D1 |
| MongoDB | Prisma with MongoDB connector |
The storage abstraction layer enables switching backends based on deployment requirements without affecting the application code.
References
- Prisma Supported Databases
- Prisma Database Features Matrix
- Cloudflare D1 Documentation
- Prisma MongoDB Connector
- Database Evaluation - Comprehensive PlanetScale vs Neon vs Cloudflare vs Prisma comparison with proposed PostgreSQL schema and Hyperdrive integration